Harris Poll finds nation supports courthouse access -- do Supreme Court judges?
Note to readers: links to news articles may not work after a few weeks, as news media remove current stories to their archives. The link may take you to the archives section, where, for a fee, you can view the article.
Mar. 23, 2004 -- Most people believe that "states should be required to make courthouses and other public buildings accessible to people with disabilities," according to a nationwide Harris Poll of 3,378 adults surveyed online between January 19 and 28.
This is heartening news. It relates to a case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Justices might very well rule the opposite way.
The case, known as Tennessee v. Lane and Jones, was filed by George Lane, Beverly Jones and two others, all of whom were denied access to courtrooms on the second floors of buildings lacking elevators. They argued that Tennessee has an obligation under the Americans with Disabilities Act to make courtrooms accessible. (Read more about the case from our Dec. 23 E-Letter.)
In oral arguments before the Court Jan. 13, Tennessee argued that it has immunity from suits of this type. The Tennessee Attorney General argued that Congress did not have the authority to subject the state of Tennessee to suit. A number of other states joined Tennessee in arguing that states should not be bound by the ADA. The New York Times's Adam Cohen's editorial on the case makes the issues clear -- it's online at http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/11/opinion/11SUN3.html (free registration required).
The Court ruling in the case could come any day now -- the Justices will have to rule on it by the end of June.
Humphrey writes, "When this sample of all adults was presented with two arguments for each side in the case, they almost all agreed with the arguments against the states. The arguments for the states were rejected by large majorities but were accepted by larger minorities:
Read the compete poll results.